http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091129/ap_on_re_eu/eu_sweden_killer_moose
So last year a Swedish woman was found dead in the woods. The husband was charged with the murder, but has been released after police decided that the murderer was most likely a moose. How in the world could those two be confused? If she was killed by a moose, wouldn't she have obvious signs of that? Like being stabbed with antlers or hoof-shaped bruises from being trampled? If things like that were not present then how did the police decide that a moose was to blame? I am so confused. This would be rather funny if a woman had not lost her life.
No comments:
Post a Comment